What Staff Really Want When Confronted With Change

What Staff Really Want When Confronted With Change

16-Oct-2025 15:15:41
Find me on:
What Staff Really Want When Confronted With Change
5:26

Change is stressful. Gartner reports that 73% of change-affected employees experience moderate to high stress, which drags on performance if unaddressed. Targeted incentives reduce friction and speed adoption

Change isn’t just a matter of process or technology — it’s a matter of people. When rolling out new business systems or custom software, many leaders underestimate the gap between announcing a change and seeing it fully adopted. The right incentives can help close that gap. However, simply supporting adoption does not replace good UX design, effective processes, workload protection, or psychological safety. Poorly designed processes or thin training won’t be rescued by rewards. Additionally, if change is not effectively communicated, you risk resistance and confusion.

This guide outlines practical, informed approaches to motivating staff through organisational change, drawing on research and real-world rollouts.

Why Incentives Matter

When uncertainty rises, people fall back on habit. Effective incentives reframe change from a risk to a safe, worthwhile step by rewarding the exact behaviours the new system requires. The rewards that cut through are relevant to the role, applied fairly, and delivered with visible respect — recognition that says, “this work matters”.

The Psychology Behind Motivation

Daniel Pink’s widely cited book Drive points to three key drivers of motivation:

  1. Autonomy: the desire to direct one’s own life.
  2. Mastery: the urge to get better at something meaningful.
  3. Purpose: the need to be part of something bigger than oneself.

These drivers are particularly useful when designing incentive strategies for change programmes.

Types of Incentives That Actually Work

Personal Recognition

  • Thank people promptly and specifically for adoption behaviours (e.g., completing first end-to-end transactions, raising quality issues early). Public, behaviour-linked recognition is associated with stronger pro-social and helping behaviours.
  • For example, each week, publish a short note naming those who completed their first end-to-end transaction in the new system within five working days, and why it mattered.

Role-Based Opportunities

  • Early adopters can be change champions, UAT testers, or on-the-floor support. Adjust day-to-day targets so providing help doesn’t feel like punishment by workload. This supports autonomy and mastery while spreading know-how.
  • For example, appoint a champion per function, reduce their BAU targets by 20% for two sprints, and have them coach peers and log issues for the backlog.

Skill-Building as a Reward

  • Position the rollout as career growth, not mere compliance. Provide short, job-relevant upskilling tied to the new way of working. Evidence reviews suggest incentives work best when they are clearly linked to defined performance standards and are seen as fair.
  • For example, a novice shadows a domain expert on one live case, then completes the same case independently in the system with no manual workarounds.

Peer-to-Peer Recognition

  • Simple nomination systems or leaderboards can reinforce helpful behaviours across teams. Peer recognition is linked with increased in-group helping.
  • For example, run a fortnightly “most helpful guide/s” nomination with small, visible rewards. Publish criteria and examples so it feels fair.

Team-Based Rewards

  • Change is often a group effort. Celebrate team milestones, not just individual ones — this builds collaboration and accountability.
  • For example, if a site keeps approval SLAs at 90% or higher for 60 days, grant a floating team day or flexible hours for the next sprint.

Flexible Time Benefits

  • For some employees, time is more valuable than money. Early adopters or high contributors could earn flexible hours, remote days, or even an extra day off.
  • For example, when a team reaches its audit-trail completeness target, issue the benefit within the same week to keep momentum. Timely, contingent reinforcement is a well-supported behaviour-change principle.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Tokenism: Staff spot box-ticking quickly. Publish criteria up front and apply them consistently.
  • One-size-fits-all rewards: Offer a small menu; different roles value different things.
  • Delayed reinforcement: Recognise within 24–72 hours of the behaviour to build momentum.
  • Workload blind spots: If you ask people to coach peers or test on the new system, reduce other targets formally to avoid burnout.

Linking Incentives to Software Adoption

When implementing a tailored FlowCentric solution, make sure your incentive structure aligns with specific behavioural goals:

  • First clean, end-to-end process completed in FlowCentric.
  • On-time approvals and SLA adherence per team.
  • Useful feedback or defect reports that lead to a design fix.
  • Peer coaching hours completed and rated as helpful.

This approach turns the software rollout into a shared, visible journey, rather than a silent back-end switch.

Final Thought

You can’t force people to embrace change, but you can make it worth their while. The best incentives are not about bribery, they’re about building belief.

FlowCentric helps leaders design systems people want to use and build the conditions that make change stick — so you move from chaos to clarity with evidence to show it.

Contact FlowCentric to take your business from #ChaosToClarity.

Topics: Guides and Resources, Path to Custom-Built Software Success

SEARCH BLOG
  • There are no suggestions because the search field is empty.

Latest News

Follow Blog